teamkanaya:Sex is sex. Sexuality is sexuality. There’s no reason to assume hatesex and pitysex are completely separate animals because they have one thing linking them, SEX. <3 and <3< are linked because they are sexual in nature, while <> and c8< are linked because of their non-sexual nature. This isn’t rocket science, you need to have a basic attraction to someone to want to have sex with them.
The pail-based reproductive method we assume involves ‘sex’, yes. But we don’t know that that “attraction” is at all the same across this fictional alien romance system!!!
Your outrage relies entirely on the assumption that the attraction involved in both quadrants is intractably identical. He hasn’t said it is. He said that they both involve attraction, and that the love and hate can switch back and forth in cases, but he never drew us a venn diagram of what “attraction” means across both quadrants. Your assertion is that this is incredibly offensive if X is true! Well since nobody said X was true, what if X is not true????
In fact, given that Andrew seems to be going the route that has Kanaya hating Gamzee at least temporarily, well, isn’t it easy to assume that X isn’t true since he doesn’t mean to offend?
All I hear you saying is “A lesbian can 'Fuck That Guy’ if its funny enough, the fact that its HORRIFICALLY OFFENSIVE doesn’t matter if Andrew can get a few chuckles out of it”. The fuck?
NO! I was categorically NOT saying that, and also saying that the people who pretty much implicitly shat on lesbians by saying Kanaya could be attracted to guys despite what Andrew explicitly said were dumb.
But since alien romance is weird, we can’t categorically say that her having an explicit, word of god fetish for one gender as applied to a quadrant has to apply to the other attractive quadrant that Andrew wasn’t talking about. The greatest evidence it doesn’t? It’s happening right now!
I really don’t see what the big deal about this is.
The heart and spade quadrants are linked, cross-quadrant relations take place there all the time. In essence by saying that there’s enough evidence to assume Kanaya could want a concupiscent relationship with Gamzee isn’t much different from saying she could want a matespritship under slightly different circumstances. I mean, if you’re going to fill pails with someone anyway…
Let’s be clear.
Andrew made these quadrants. He made them up.
Andrew called Kanaya basically a lesbian, and said she was only attracted to females, though the subject was flushed relationships.
Then Andrew had her hate the clown.
So either:
- Andrew is an evil lesbian-hater who thinks they can change their sexuality at whim, OR:
- Hate works differently, and none of this is controversial.
It’s my personal opinion that Andrew Hussie is neither hateful nor a dumbass. Therefore, I think (2) is most goddamn likely. Is that a problem?
There are other ways to make this funny without offending people which you’re ignoring because they aren’t the obvious thing. Since when does Andrew do the obvious thing in all situations? Last I checked, doing precisely what is expected of him is a rare occurrence for him.
But clearly I’m a horrible person for leveraging my experience and thinking the obvious is right every once in a while.
Did I say I love Kanaya <3< Gamzee? No! Did I say nothing else can ever happen? No! Did I say Kanaya isn’t a lesbian, or that lesbians can somehow like guys? No! None of those things are what I said.
I said that it looks like he’s tying off a loose pairing, and that loose pairings tied off like this tend to be non-controversial, settled sorts of affairs. I extrapolated towards that pairing working. Is there a reason anyone should have a problem with that? I don’t think so!
It just seems mind-numbingly lazy of you to assume that there’s only one answer here and to discount other theories because they don’t go along with what you think is the funniest possibility.
I am just personally assuming Z for a long list of reasons, and I have spent hours voluntarily elaborating on the nuances and justifying my position to you. Hours! If this is lazy, then I’m Woodrow Wilson.
Just because you like Y and W better than Z doesn’t mean that I’m lazy for discounting them after a thorough review. Especially when I rather explicitly say that it’s not my place, not my inclination, and not my passion to go into the gritty details of non-dramatic side-pairings like this and Feferi <3 Sollux, anyway!!!
Professionally, I don’t care all that much about Kanaya’s caliginous quadrant because it isn’t being played for romantic drama. Personally, I hope Kanaya gets everything she wants romantically and more, even if what she wants is to hate the clown. Which is not an unreasonable assumption!
You said it yourself, you didn’t predict this could offend anyone and suddenly you have this to defend yourself from this kind of shit. Andrew is genre savvy as hell, he knew exactly what he was getting into when he publicized Kanaya’s sexuality. Going back on it now would be welcoming a much larger shitstorm, not like the backlash of intolerant jackasses who got upset over Gamzee wanting to make out with Tavros. He would be in the wrong, the shit he gets would be shit he brought upon himself. He would need some kind of serious justification to take that risk and I’ve been asking you to produce such a justification. I haven’t seen anything approximating that out of you yet and that’s why I’m disappointed.
Maybe that’s just my fault for expecting better.
Andrew made this move because he thought it would work in his head and it made sense.
In other words, it made sense in his head, the place where this story and alien race was made, for the lesbian alien to romantically hate a guy in an alien romantic quadrant he made up.
Up until now, I had never seen or heard the assumption that Kanaya was canonically a lesbian in every quadrant, or any quadrant other than red. I had no reason to believe strongly in either direction. Andrew hadn’t said anything, the story hadn’t said anything. Some people thought it could make sense that Kanaya would be attracted to females hateways, because of the lesbian thing. Other people thought it could make sense that she’d even exclusively hate males, perhaps as an inverse to the lesbian thing in the red quadrant. I did not subscribe to either of these assumptions.
I did not do so because we had no evidence, no likely caliginous pairings for her, and I knew better from experience with Karkat’s moirallegiance plot than to assume traits of troll romance that we hadn’t been explicitly shown. I knew that we did not know.
And now that we have evidence that a male hate relationship can be a thing for her, I don’t see a problem with casually, tentatively assuming that said relationship could stay a thing.
If there’s anything objectively wrong with this, I can’t see it.
And maybe Andrew didn’t see it either. Or, maybe he decided that there was objectively nothing wrong with making his own alien race have discrete forms of attraction, and that anyone who had assumed otherwise might as well deal with it.
2012-3-15
WHY IS THIS SO TRUE